From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where is ewoc--node-delete Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 13:36:43 +0200 Message-ID: <853bf3bodw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87ves0fr0k.fsf@utanet.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148211455 28525 80.91.229.2 (21 May 2006 11:37:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 11:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Thien-Thi Nguyen , Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Reich=F6r?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 21 13:37:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhmFN-00024M-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:37:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhmFN-0004Ws-Fy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FhmFC-0004W9-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FhmFC-0004Vk-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhmFC-0004Vc-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FhmIw-0004Tn-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FhmFA-0005SB-Uk; Sun, 21 May 2006 07:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D22971C27933; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 21 May 2006 07:33:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54944 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> As a special case, if PREDICATE is t, ARGS specifies nodes to be >> deleted unconditionally." > > This is very ugly. Sort of what an XEmacs interface would look like... At the very least, we should have a wrapper to ewoc-filter doing that. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum