From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:08:32 -0500 Message-ID: <85384um7cf.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <85a90ggf2d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <54E0A40F.5080603@dancol.org> <83sie7un20.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D181.2080802@dancol.org> <83r3trulse.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D7E0.305@87.69.4.28> <83h9unukbg.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0DEF8.7020901@dancol> <83egpruiyp.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0FF93.2000104@dancol.org> <833865vp4d.fsf@gnu.org> <54E2355A.90@87.69.4.28> <83vbj1u020.fsf@gnu.org> <54E24CA4.9020601@dancol.org> <83h9uk7ddb.fsf@gnu.org> <54E382A5.5030408@dancol.org> <85a8zcu8gn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427232075 21175 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 21:21:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:21:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 22:21:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWFq-0004cW-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:20:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34597 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWFp-0006ej-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWFP-0006ee-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWFM-0005BV-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.25.95]:48162) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaWFL-0005Au-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 23111 invoked by uid 0); 24 Mar 2015 21:20:18 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2015 21:20:18 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmgw2 with id 7ZL31q01r2UdiVW01ZL9yZ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:20:14 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=XvNpZz19 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=2wGvvwaKUHMA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=jrwKn-8xaegA:10 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=0llHYj81qufHQP1kLbYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] (port=52813 helo=TAKVER) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YaW42-0006iB-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:08:42 -0600 In-Reply-To: <85a8zcu8gn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (Stephen Leake's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:02:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 70.94.38.149 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 69.89.25.95 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184184 Archived-At: Stephen Leake writes: > Aur=C3=A9lien Aptel writes: > >> I've tried to implement modules using Daniel's plan. It turned out to >> be pretty easy, mostly because I'm more familiar with the Emacs >> codebase now and because it's a lot less intrusive than my previous >> attempt. >> >> It's not finished but I have a basic module working on linux. It's a >> proof of concept, basically. > > I've implemented a test module that calls two Ada mode parser actions > (see below). I've now translated that test module into Ada, and that version also works on both Windows and Debian. It is far easier to import this emacs_module.h into Ada than the subset of lisp.h in the other dynamic modules approach. It will also be easier for other module implementation languages to use. So I suggest we adopt this approach as the way forward. --=20 -- Stephe