From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?Kai_Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME) Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 20:28:36 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <84ptm6anjf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <200305211953.h4LJr9Iq000699@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200305212229.h4LMTFKo001277@rum.cs.yale.edu> <878yszvean.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wughogc8.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053887320 30343 80.91.224.249 (25 May 2003 18:28:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 18:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 25 20:28:37 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19K0EX-0007t6-00 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 20:28:37 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19K0RN-0000qY-00 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 20:41:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19K0Fz-0007FZ-SW for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 14:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19K0Ey-0006j3-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 14:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19K0Et-0006al-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 14:28:59 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19K0Er-0006TH-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 14:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19K0Cs-0007o6-00 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 20:26:54 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19K0Cr-0007nx-00 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 20:26:53 +0200 Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IeiWLsYOUG3TsyaxbVdEF52rFtU= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14252 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14252 Richard Stallman writes: > Right now, if I switch to buffer RMAIL, I see the message that is > selected in the buffer RMAIL. If that message is actually displayed > in another buffer, then switching to RMAIL won't show it, or won't > show it properly. The whole file could be in a buffer " RMAIL file". Then the RMAIL buffer would contain what you expect. Some voodoo may be required to make C-x C-f ~/RMAIL RET work as expected. (What is expected? Maybe show the first message from the file, or something.) -- This line is not blank.