From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann)
Subject: Re: info
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:39:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84n0lj821a.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.SUN.3.91.1030130074649.795B-100000@is
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> I believe this arebitrary predictability is not very useful, except in
> those cases where the text between the two *'s is short. As other
> examples in this thread show, sometimes this approach is simply wrong.
First of all, if point is on a menu line, then choose that menu
item. That much we all agree on.
Further, if point is on a line starting with whitespace and
containing some non-whitespace text, this could be a continuation
line for a menu line.
Here's an algorithm:
IF point is on a menu line
THEN
choose that menu item
ELSE
IF point is on a line that starts with whitespace and contains
non-whitespace characters
THEN
WHILE point is on a nonblank line starting with whitespace
DO
move up one line
END
IF point is on a menu line
THEN
choose that menu item
FI
FI
FI
What do people think?
--
Ambibibentists unite!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-30 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-29 1:33 info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 3:53 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 6:29 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 19:57 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 5:46 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 21:17 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-29 17:33 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-29 20:39 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-29 23:21 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 5:48 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 8:39 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2003-01-30 15:11 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 16:30 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 20:02 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 20:51 ` info Kai Großjohann
2003-01-30 22:37 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-31 1:51 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-31 13:05 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-31 20:22 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-01 1:22 ` info Robert J. Chassell
2003-01-29 21:17 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-30 0:31 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 1:43 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-30 2:03 ` info Luc Teirlinck
[not found] <84smvc2guf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>
2003-01-29 14:20 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-30 15:21 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-01-30 16:21 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-01-31 19:20 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-01 1:22 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-01 22:11 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-02 4:59 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-02 5:44 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-02-02 6:09 ` info Miles Bader
2003-02-03 14:40 ` info Stefan Monnier
2003-02-03 19:00 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-03 19:16 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-03 19:19 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-04 15:41 ` info Richard Stallman
2003-02-05 6:08 ` info Eli Zaretskii
2003-02-05 20:07 ` info Luc Teirlinck
2003-02-09 4:45 ` info Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84n0lj821a.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).