From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:19:59 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <84he8lovtc.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051388534 32439 80.91.224.249 (26 Apr 2003 20:22:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 26 22:22:12 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199WBY-0008R4-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:22:12 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199WIu-0003UE-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:29:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199WC9-0005nI-04 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199WBq-0005h0-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 199WBo-0005aM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 199WBn-0005U4-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199WAk-0008O4-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:21:22 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199WAj-0008Nu-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:21:21 +0200 Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SScvngppM7BpeMigxtZSSCDFgUQ= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13481 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13481 Simon Josefsson writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> Mentioning this in PROBLEMS seems like a good idea to me, but a useful >> entry needs to be stated in terms of what behavior the user sees. >> This text doesn't explain the practical consequences; a user would say >> "so what does that mean for me?" > > Is this better? Can you say what characters you're talking about, instead of just the code points? I guess that most people haven't memorized the Unicode table (your truly included ;-). -- file-error; Data: (Opening input file no such file or directory ~/.signature)