From: <klaus.berndl@sdm.de>
To: <jasonr@gnu.org>, <joakim@verona.se>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: RE: patch for optional inhibit of delete-other-windows(IDE feature)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:09:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E347AEF1@mucmail3.sdm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4815C977.3040502@gnu.org>
Jason Rumney wrote:
> joakim@verona.se wrote:
>
>> How do you feel about the current interface:
>>
>> delete-other-windows t, inhibits delete-other-windows
>>
>> other-window numeric arg, the arg will group windows together, when
>> other-window is performed, only windows in the same group are
>> considered. I plan to do this by adding an argument to next_window.
>>
>> The parameters might obvioulsy be renamed.
>>
>
> The first definitely needs renaming. Its value is used to determine
> the behaviour of the current window (not other windows), and its
> value is used in the inverse way that the name suggests. Perhaps
> inhibit-deletion would be better. The downside is that the rename
> loses the association with the function delete-other-windows, but is
> that the only function that needs to look at this property anyway?
no, definitly delete-window too - in case of ECB it must be ensured
that a user can not delete one of the special windows...
Currently the advice of delete-window prevents from this....
Then split-window-* because such special windows must also not
splitted...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 22:35 patch for optional inhibit of delete-other-windows(IDE feature) joakim
2008-04-26 1:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-26 6:56 ` joakim
2008-04-28 1:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-28 11:26 ` joakim
2008-04-28 11:41 ` Miles Bader
2008-04-28 11:55 ` joakim
2008-04-28 18:26 ` Re[2]: " Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-28 14:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-28 14:38 ` joakim
2008-04-28 15:04 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-28 12:56 ` Jason Rumney
2008-04-30 8:09 ` klaus.berndl [this message]
2008-05-08 10:06 ` joakim
2008-05-08 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-26 14:49 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-04-28 1:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-29 11:05 ` joakim
2008-04-29 12:13 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 13:31 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 13:47 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 15:47 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 18:29 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 20:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-29 23:16 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-04-29 23:16 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-04-30 5:57 ` joakim
2008-04-30 7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-30 8:15 ` joakim
2008-04-30 9:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-30 10:47 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-30 22:01 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-04-30 22:01 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-01 2:57 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-01 23:44 ` Richard M Stallman
[not found] <m37iela60f.fsf@verona.se>
[not found] ` <84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E3429A02@mucmail3.sdm.de>
2008-04-28 11:14 ` joakim
2008-04-28 11:50 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-28 15:34 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-28 15:55 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-28 15:58 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-28 22:01 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 8:46 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 13:30 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 14:27 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 15:47 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 16:35 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-04-29 18:04 ` Re[2]: " Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-29 18:27 ` klaus.berndl
2008-04-29 19:04 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-29 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-29 21:28 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 21:27 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-29 23:08 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-30 5:37 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-30 11:55 ` Re[2]: " Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-30 13:43 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-30 15:29 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2008-04-30 15:38 ` Robert J. Chassell
2008-04-29 21:27 ` martin rudalics
2008-04-30 3:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-04-28 19:45 ` Richard M Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E347AEF1@mucmail3.sdm.de \
--to=klaus.berndl@sdm.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jasonr@gnu.org \
--cc=joakim@verona.se \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).