From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: patch for optional inhibit of delete-other-windows(IDE feature) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:29:10 +0200 Message-ID: <84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E347AC6B@mucmail3.sdm.de> References: <84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E342A309@mucmail3.sdm.de> <4817231E.90307@gmx.at> <84D8FEFE8D23E94E9C2A6F0C58EE07E342A409@mucmail3.sdm.de> <48174315.9080501@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209493823 22392 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2008 18:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 29 20:30:59 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jqub7-0004jz-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:30:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JquaO-0001LY-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JquZr-0000tI-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JquZp-0000sZ-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42484 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JquZp-0000sS-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from world2.sdm.de ([192.76.162.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JquZl-0001dk-Nk; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mucns1 ([10.40.232.18] helo=mucns1.sdm.de) by world2.sdm.de with esmtp (MTA) id 1JquZk-0006CM-H9; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:29:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sdmmail1.sdm.de) by mucns1.sdm.de with esmtp (MTA) id 1JquZk-0002tj-9b; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:29:12 +0200 Original-Received: from mucmail3.sdm.de ([10.40.232.45]) by sdmmail1.sdm.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:29:11 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: <48174315.9080501@gmx.at> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: patch for optional inhibit of delete-other-windows(IDE feature) Thread-Index: AciqEK6KYabFp2leRfmpvJ7t3hAqcwAFiQgw X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2008 18:29:11.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB7EE420:01C8AA26] X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96158 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > > copying the whole stuff in an own `display-buffer-function' is not > > the smartest approach - with XEmacs i have done exactly this > because > XEmacs had an elisp display-buffer for a long time - but > copying > these huge amount of code (in parts ugly code - at least > the XEmacs- > version) into an own display-buffer-function and then > finding(!!) > and then patching a very small portion for the > ECB-needs is really > a pain - here IMHO is the choosen > advice-approach of ECB much smarter > - but anyway: If you prefer a > full functional copied and patched > display-buffer-function instead > of a save and smart advice, it would > be fine for me... ;-) >=20 > I don't understand: You can stuff the advice related code into > `display-buffer-function' and call the real `display-buffer' from > there (with `display-buffer-function' temporarily bound to nil). ok, you are right - i had this idea not in my mind...