From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:32:11 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <848yu2tmc4.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <84r87ulpts.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <20030422123301.GA26968@gnu.org> <84lly2lity.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <20030422150920.GA7693@gnu.org> <84n0iijz8u.fsf@boost-consulting.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051037030 25354 80.91.224.249 (22 Apr 2003 18:43:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 20:43:47 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1982jT-0006XW-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:43:07 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1982oq-0006jB-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:48:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 1982js-0003hY-01 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 1982j7-0003HT-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 1982iS-0002ER-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 1982iN-00023U-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1982gs-0006KG-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:40:26 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1982aF-0005pQ-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:33:35 +0200 Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8YeS5wanR9Q8E2kUJieWzsBL4BY= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13367 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13367 David Abrahams writes: > Believe it or not, I'm familiar with good bug reporting practice. The > problem is that I don't know whether anyone's interested in looking at > it and I feel that I can't give much detail about the problem. I can > say that it's been reproduced by others, though. Hm. Could you go down a bit to a lower level? For example, Gnus invokes nnimap on IMAP groups, which in turn invokes imap.el to do the actual network communication. Maybe you can devise a sequence of function calls from imap.el that show the slowness? Are you talking SSL with your IMAP server? -- file-error; Data: (Opening input file no such file or directory ~/.signature)