From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?Kai_Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rationale for split-string? Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:00:26 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <843cj7hvqt.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <87brz57at2.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200304171744.h3HHiJCx009215@rum.cs.yale.edu> <87adem27ey.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ist8yv4n.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87vfx5vor0.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87el2uz8jb.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053616157 19684 80.91.224.249 (22 May 2003 15:09:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 17:09:15 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19IrfA-0004va-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 17:07:24 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19IrqT-0005e8-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 17:19:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Irfw-0000w0-Km for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Irfb-0000vR-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19IrdC-0000fI-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Ird9-0000dF-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:19 -0400 Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19IrYl-0004Ln-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 17:00:47 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19IrWq-0004C1-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 16:58:48 +0200 Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ycb1FrUE/4vfoR4bNKyjORfNxkA= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14093 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14093 "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Enclosed are patches for lisp/subr.el and lispref/strings.texi to > implement the API for split-string discussed earlier. I wonder what's going to happen with this? It hasn't been committed, AFAICS. Does anyone know? -- This line is not blank.