From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows
Subject: Re: [h-e-w] bug#10612: GnuTLS bundled with the windows Emacs	binaries
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:11 +0200
Message-ID: <83zkdaz26s.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <84boromyob.fsf@tum.de> <m3lipk5scv.fsf@stories.gnus.org>
	<84ipknew07.fsf@tum.de> <87ipjzs512.fsf@gnus.org>
	<87wr8e8o58.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com>
	<CAAeL0SQsvGjOwpbyknorVrhNn9r+FwLPFZxQthofOZk-YfEaqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ipjy6z0j.fsf@lifelogs.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327606634 15118 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 19:37:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:37:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 20:37:09 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.17] (helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqV89-0003QQ-Ip
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:37:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49895 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqV7w-0005IM-Bu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:56 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55983 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RqV7u-0005H6-0z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:55 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RqV7i-0005H9-7W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:48 -0500
Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43848)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqV7h-0005Gz-VW; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:42 -0500
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0LYF00J007P01O00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:39 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.102.195]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0LYF00IOE7T327G0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:39 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <87ipjy6z0j.fsf@lifelogs.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147956 gmane.emacs.windows:5229
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/147956>

> From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:32:12 -0600
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> JB> Christoph's binaries are built against gnutls-3.0.9, but they do not
> JB> include the GnuTLS DLLs.
> 
> Right, and GnuTLS 3.0.9 is not the latest.  I meant he should be
> building against the latest GnuTLS, not include it.

You are being unreasonable.  3.0.9 was released just a month ago.  A
new GnuTLS release happens every 2 weeks, how can you expect each one
of them be ported to Windows at that pace?  Do you think it's just the
"./configure && make" dance we are used to on GNU/Linux?  It took me a
full week of uphill battle to do that with 3.0.9, what with all the
prerequisite packages I needed to port first.  The previous port
before that was of v2.10, from a year and a half ago.  How come it
suddenly is so urgent to have the latest and the greatest?

In any case, feel free to join the battle and help out, instead of
coming up with such unreasonable requirements.

> I was gonna bring that up next :)  What does "semi-official" mean?  Can
> I work with Christoph to include the GnuTLS DLLs or not?  If not, can we
> add a notice to his binaries announcements to tell users where to find
> prebuilt GnuTLS DLLs?

You (or anyone else) can find the prebuilt Windows binaries of
GnuTLS 3.0.9 here:

  http://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/