From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Setting TZ in set_time_zone_rule Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 05:44:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk21ul87.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83624pwq8z.fsf@gnu.org> <50B67266.1000509@cs.ucla.edu> <50B6B886.9020309@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354160634 16023 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2012 03:43:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 03:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 29 04:44:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdv2j-000141-Ey for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:44:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53403 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdv2Y-000107-8z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:43:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdv2W-000102-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdv2V-0002xB-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:43:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:34376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdv2V-0002x0-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:43:51 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ME800K00CVVCM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 05:43:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ME800K1QD112U50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 05:43:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50B6B886.9020309@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155119 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:21:10 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Fabrice Popineau , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 11/28/2012 01:24 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > setenv is required since 2004. > > Yes, thanks, so that'd be a better choice than putenv. > There's a gnulib module for setenv too, for the hosts > that lack it. Presumably Emacs's existing uses of > putenv could be modernized to use setenv. So would it be a problem to use 'setenv' in that function?