From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:48:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjydy8ny.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> <87txomz1j7.fsf@yandex.ru> <83li9yyyul.fsf@gnu.org> <87li9xu9y5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362772148 21222 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 19:49:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 19:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 20:49:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UE3II-0003IA-6Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:49:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41234 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UE3Hw-0003fY-8M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UE3Ho-0003fM-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UE3Hk-00024T-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UE3Hj-00024G-SU; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJC00L00XM2US00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:48:54 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJC00LPEXPGUK10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:48:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87li9xu9y5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157624 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67990 Archived-At: > From: Achim Gratz > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:34:42 +0100 > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > In any case, doing the built-in packages this way (or something similar) > takes a lot of unecessary churn and merges out of the release process > and I would think that would be a clear advantage to everyone involved. I see that we have come a full circle, what with all this new blood pouring into Emacs development, and we are finally ready to repeat the failed experiment with dividing Emacs into "core" and "all the rest". Good luck (you will need it)!