From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Addition of SES local printer functions. Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:55:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjndw4nm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <80sit5p73x.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388757379 17363 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 13:56:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Vincent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bela=EFche?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 03 14:56:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz5EU-0005fG-Fo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:56:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50004 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz5EU-0001IX-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz5EM-0001IL-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz5ED-000151-HK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:56867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz5ED-00014g-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYT00C00VX37W00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:55:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYT00CBMW174080@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:55:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <80sit5p73x.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167159 Archived-At: > From: Vincent Bela=EFche =20 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:44:50 +0100 >=20 >=20 > Shouldn't that be in that order: >=20 > bzr merge -r 115841..115840 > bzr ci -m "Reverted revision 115841." >=20 > bzr merge -r 115838..115837 > bzr ci -m "Reverted revision 115838." >=20 >=20 > i.e revert first 115841 and second 115838 ? No, it shouldn't matter. You can do it in your order, if you want.