From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:39:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziya8xph.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k2ptq5t3.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kxx60e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877flswse5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737wgw7kf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87io5bv1it.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87egfzuwca.fsf@lifelogs.com> <876118u6f2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737w3qero.fsf@lifelogs.com> <831tbn9g9j.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5upw7o.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447904392 27587 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2015 03:39:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:39:52 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 19 04:39:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzG4V-0005XU-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:39:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39381 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzG4V-0006zq-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:39:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzG4H-0006zi-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzG4C-0000A9-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:39:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzG4C-00009Z-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY100500M59UZ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:39:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY1005L1M5LO370@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:39:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878u5upw7o.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194771 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:19:23 -0500 > > Sorry for letting bad formatting slip through. I checked the code but I > guess wasn't thorough. Would you recommend a specific tool for the > formatting review? I just use my eyes. Maybe others can recommend some tools. > >> * should there be a separate manual or at least a section in the developer manual? > > EZ> Of course! Every feature should be documented, and this one is no > EZ> exception. I suggest to start with NEWS. > > My goal with that question was actually to find out *where* the > developer docs should go, not whether they are necessary. Sorry, it wasn't clear to me. I think the place is the ELisp manual. I see no reason to have a separate manual, since I don't expect the documentation to be large enough to justify that. Thanks.