From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 88578a4: Increase the default number of hits Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:53:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziwob93e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87wps1ghyu.fsf@gnus.org> <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si2oq5z2.fsf@gnus.org> <90mvswd7ej.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ege8l98o.fsf@gnus.org> <87si2lppuq.fsf@gmx.de> <87fuyhpq28.fsf@gmx.de> <834mewcqtf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451728470 7178 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2016 09:54:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 10:54:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aFItD-0007wN-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:54:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFItC-0005go-5S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 04:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFIsv-0005gg-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 04:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFIsq-0003YD-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 04:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aFIsq-0003Y9-GO; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 04:54:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1443 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aFIsp-0006dw-Sd; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 04:54:00 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:01:10 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197358 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:01:10 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Any idea why this is different with async than without it? > > It's the inter-process communication and the base64 that's affecting > it. I think. Possibly. (async.el works by starting a separate Emacs, > and then talking to it over a socket...) How is process-coding-system set up for communicating with the subsidiary Emacs? it should be no-conversion, I think, at least in the input direction (i.e. from the subsidiary Emacs to the parent one).