From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows warnings (was build failure) for Emacs master Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:16:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83zisxe2uo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56CCD91E.6070507@alice.it> <83egc2ixji.fsf@gnu.org> <56CD798D.7060102@alice.it> <56CD8408.1000701@alice.it> <83wppuggb4.fsf@gnu.org> <56CE2CA7.5050906@alice.it> <83io1cg2pt.fsf@gnu.org> <56DA0327.2030009@alice.it> <83oaatxu72.fsf@gnu.org> <570C4307.6050907@alice.it> <87k2k3t5xb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <570D6093.8010305@alice.it> <570D7C3B.90206@cs.ucla.edu> <831t69fs2v.fsf@gnu.org> <570E8AA4.50307@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460575036 23500 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2016 19:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angelo.graziosi@alice.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 21:17:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHm-0003Hq-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:17:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHl-0001GK-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHh-0001Cs-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHg-0003dr-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHa-0003br-He; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4619 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aqQHZ-0008Vm-RF; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:16:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <570E8AA4.50307@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:06:28 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202883 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:06:28 -0700 > > > In that case the %ul format spec should suffice to print the number, Right. > unless you'd prefer to feed the number into FormatMessage as Yuri > suggested. No, I see no need. These errors should never happen, and I think the function in question is not used nowadays anyway.