From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-announce] Emacs pretest 25.0.93 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:48:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83zisk4erk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3dxbln9.fsf@petton.fr> <87bn50pn65.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <834mas5y4i.fsf@gnu.org> <877ffopkzt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8737qcpklh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8337qc5w01.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb38o3ll.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461419366 10104 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2016 13:49:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 23 15:49:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1atxw1-0005bF-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:49:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atxvz-0003Up-MP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atxvv-0003Rq-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atxvs-0006Xc-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atxvs-0006XY-L0; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3146 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1atxvs-00039Y-1f; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:49:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <87vb38o3ll.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (message from Achim Gratz on Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:29:42 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Topics: emacs-announce X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203212 Archived-At: > From: Achim Gratz > Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:29:42 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Run the faulting command under a debugger, put a breakpoint in > > Fsignal, and show the backtrace. That might produce enough hints to > > find out what is failing and why. > > It doesn't really fault, at least not at the lisp level. Fsignal is on the C level, so a breakpoint set there in GDB will catch any error. > There actually is an auto-save file that seems to have all the > extracted loaddefs in, but somehow it then doesn't finish. For the > autoloads entries there are lots of differences like these (I'm > comparing with the installed version of my last build): > > -;;;### (autoloads nil "cal-iso" "cal-iso.el" t) > +;;;### (autoloads nil "cal-iso" "cal-iso.el" (22225 49314 854982 > +;;;;;; 791000)) AFAIU, these differences are meaningless. But I have no autoloads whose time stamp is 't'. The problem is still the error that is signaled, and the way to investigate it is to figure out why the error is signaled.