From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:21:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83zin630i9.fsf@gnu.org> References: > <83intw5our.fsf@gnu.org>> <3dbc0c03-56f9-4b6f-bd3b-258458967665@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474132989 18300 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2016 17:23:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 19:23:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blJKI-0002os-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:22:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blJKG-0000WA-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blJJR-0000Uz-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blJJQ-0001sm-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blJJL-0001pv-PY; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:21:55 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2256 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1blJJH-0000mC-PF; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:21:54 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:30:00 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207493 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:30:00 -0700 > > When it comes to UI, I'm in complete agreement with Eli: I love DWIM behavior, > and think this is a virtue of Emacs, not a vice in any way. If DWIM is okay in the UI, then functions that behave in support of that UI should also be okay.