From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] xwidget webkit: Use WebKit2 API. Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:12:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83zin1dq3q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160921115018.29576-1-rekado@elephly.net> <83oa3hfgr4.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvj184z4.fsf@elephly.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474485206 31683 195.159.176.226 (21 Sep 2016 19:13:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 21:13:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmxI-0007JJ-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51222 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmxH-0005sh-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48013) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmwW-0005sD-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmwQ-00044r-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmwQ-00044b-FM; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4407 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bmmwM-0000Dk-Lj; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:12:21 -0400 In-reply-to: <87mvj184z4.fsf@elephly.net> (message from Ricardo Wurmus on Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:47:43 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207673 Archived-At: > From: Ricardo Wurmus > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:47:43 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Okay, I’ll send an email to assign@gnu.org to get this done. Thanks. > Should I resend these patches in the future or just ping this thread > once the assignment is complete? (Or neither?) It depends on how much time passes until your assignment is on file. If it will take some time, it would be best to rebase your patches on the-then current master branch and resend.