From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows installer Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:09:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83zi7cah9k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <795606216.288650.1510476987589@mail.libero.it> <83po8nn38p.fsf@gnu.org> <8760adbxw6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <1369184752.491791.1510670215753@mail.libero.it> <1447748875.458066.1510690344828@mail.libero.it> <1511167607.4167724.1178177216.0DCA23E2@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87k1yh535q.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83efopbqxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87vai098f5.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511467824 13515 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2017 20:10:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jostein@kjonigsen.net, jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 23 21:10:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxpA-00037f-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:10:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxpI-00059c-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxp8-00058X-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxp6-0003pw-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxp6-0003pa-OS; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:10:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2137 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxp4-0005ci-VJ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:10:12 -0500 In-reply-to: <87vai098f5.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220411 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net, jostein@kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:06:22 +0000 > > > If you remove that, how will we know from the bug report that the > > binary they used is the one we distribute from the GNU site? It's an > > important piece of information when looking into a bug. > > For this, you just need a name which is reasonably likely to be > unique. Yes, we need a name that is not nil.