From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Floating-point constant folding in Emacs byte compiler Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:30:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83zi2uelkx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2ce39e5c-cd1b-65d6-b125-719caad67932@cs.ucla.edu> <83vadmgfbz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0zr2n1u.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8p2g99p.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522088945 20548 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2018 18:29:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 20:29:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wrd-0005EF-1p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:29:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58439 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wtg-0000Fx-IY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wsm-0000C9-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wsl-0005Di-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wsl-0005DO-KZ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3519 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Wsl-0004ef-2m; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:30:11 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:52:33 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224062 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:52:33 -0400 > > >> Hmm, would it be worthwhile to have Emacs signal overflow in such a > >> situation (perhaps controlled by a configuration variable) so we could > >> fix such issues? > > I think TRT is for the byte-compiler to refrain from performing this > optimization when the result doesn't fit within 30bits. I agree.