From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:01:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83zhyo3542.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <87bmbbmslt.fsf@gmail.com> <877elzmpjk.fsf@gmail.com> <83va9jcpfk.fsf@gnu.org> <83sh4ncoye.fsf@gnu.org> <87601j5lx2.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9fbckik.fsf@gnu.org> <86muuscvj8.fsf@gmail.com> <878t69g2cg.fsf@gmail.com> <86pnzkx58b.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1psk7c2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1531929921 14374 195.159.176.226 (18 Jul 2018 16:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 18 18:05:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ffox3-0003fB-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:05:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffozA-0006Ak-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffotZ-00028v-QR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffotV-0002EE-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffotV-0002E8-7b; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1650 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ffotU-00080o-Kg; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:01:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <87k1psk7c2.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:21:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227549 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:21:33 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > lisp/language/ethiopic.el still calls define-ccl-program, but as far > as I can tell the result is not actually used anywhere. Unless I'm missing something, it is used right there: we put it into font-ccl-encoder-alist, whose doc string should explain why. > Removing pgg and ccl completely and removing the ccl from > lisp/language/ethiopic.el doesnʼt seem to have had any adverse > effect on my emacs. Probably because you didn't use a font whose name matches "ethiopic".