From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [found the culprit] Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:09:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83zhub7iai.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zx1xgiq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83lg5w9956.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0r76ewm.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <87tvkjq2mh.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <834lcj8y1f.fsf@gnu.org> <8736s3pslm.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542211679 4447 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2018 16:07:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 14 17:07:55 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxhr-00013F-5C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:07:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxjx-0007NX-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxjD-0007NC-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxj7-0003YF-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxj7-0003Xh-5Q; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3358 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxj6-0001CQ-Eh; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:09:13 -0500 In-reply-to: <8736s3pslm.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:49:09 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231133 Archived-At: > From: Uwe Brauer > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:49:09 +0100 > > > I do think that Z on a compressed Tar archive, be it a .tar.gz or > > .tgz file, should not by default unpack the archive. We could have > > a special prefix arg to request that, and by default we should just > > uncompress the file. But that's a different issue. > > So I am confused now. What is you personal preference? > > Z: tgz (tar.gz)--> tar > > Or > > Z: tgz (tar.gz)--> unpack The former by default, the latter optionally.