From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:03:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh5xishz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200906133719.cu6yaldvenxubcqq.ref@Ergus> <20200906133719.cu6yaldvenxubcqq@Ergus> <83lfhnnew7.fsf@gnu.org> <20200906163418.3p2wuygb4osm76wa@Ergus> <20200906203807.u237c3h22oxwtmba@Ergus> <87tuwabm5a.fsf@gnus.org> <9fb02447-6189-490f-a6ee-3d037492e0e6@default> <838sdhk8ho.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37235"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, larsi@gnus.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 17:05:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO8d-0009Ye-Is for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:05:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO8c-0001qj-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO6X-0007aF-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO6V-0004UI-TJ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1874 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO6U-0000WS-PO; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:03:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:56:07 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255011 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: ghe@sdf.org, larsi@gnus.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:56:07 +0200 > > Eli> I don't think I understand what that means (never used Gnus, sorry), > Eli> and don't remember the details of the issue. But in general, why > Eli> would someone need to set Reply-To to the list address when replying > Eli> to a message from the list? It should be automatic in any sensible > Eli> MUA, no? > > They wouldnʼt, but apparently Mailman sets 'Reply-To: ghe@sdf.org' on > Gregory's behalf, which then causes Outlook to respond only to him. Then maybe Gregory should take this up with GNU folks who oversee the mailing lists? Or maybe how should do something to stop Mailman from mangling his >From address? > In Gnus, when I say 'wide reply', it hoovers up 'From,To,CC,Reply-To', > so that doesnʼt bother me. I donʼt know what rmail does, hence my > question. Rmail does the same, in general. > Maybe Drew needs a different MUA? :-) Definitely, but that's out of our control.