From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory?
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y6m9mirc.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1N9Giq-0003NY-4C@fencepost.gnu.org>
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:23:16 -0500
>
> No matter how many people use Emacs, the 1% speedup will still save
> only 1% of the time for each one of them.
>
> Sure, but even if it is only a small improvement for each person, it
> is still worth doing if it is easy. Suppose that this small speedup
> transforms "annoying" into "not annoying" for just one user in a
> thousand each day. That would mean that, each day, hundreds or thousands
> of people are happier.
But a 1% speedup will not transform "annoying" into "not annoying",
and thus will make no one happier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 20:23 t and nil in pure memory? Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-11 22:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 8:21 ` Tobias C. Rittweiler
2009-11-12 15:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-13 5:24 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-13 14:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-14 11:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-15 20:25 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-16 1:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-16 8:24 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-17 7:57 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-17 13:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-17 13:55 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-18 12:11 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-18 15:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 17:53 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-11-18 18:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 16:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-19 20:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20 4:12 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-20 5:47 ` Chong Yidong
2009-11-22 6:48 ` Sam Steingold
2009-11-22 8:14 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-19 21:05 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-15 21:08 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-16 1:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 18:53 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-18 19:03 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-11-18 19:18 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-18 19:13 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-23 3:05 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-23 5:31 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-24 16:03 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-11-24 16:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 1:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 4:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-13 4:55 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-13 8:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-14 11:23 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-14 11:46 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-11-15 22:38 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-13 4:56 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-20 7:28 A. Soare
2009-11-20 8:09 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83y6m9mirc.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=dann@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).