From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:55:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83y6e2cgwf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874ogsthn2.fsf@red-bean.com> <83fx0be7ad.fsf@gnu.org> <87eifuq2t0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277542440 20131 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2010 08:54:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 26 10:53:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSR9C-00072j-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:53:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSR9C-0006Pq-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44203 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSR8x-0006LZ-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSR8n-0001Wi-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:39978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSR8m-0001WP-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4M00M005XL5T00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:53:10 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.155.52]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4M00K4860LGU70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:53:10 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87eifuq2t0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126422 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:23:39 -0400 > > Many of the unfixed bugs are "long tail" problems that are rather > difficult to find and/or fix. This observation should be backed up by some numbers. Do we know for a fact that a significant proportion of unfixed bugs belong to this category?