From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:35:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83y5l3fsac.fsf@gnu.org> References: <502EDAF3.6030005@cs.ucla.edu> <5034A654.2080909@cs.ucla.edu> <5037F411.4010905@cs.ucla.edu> <87y5l3iwe6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50383F42.1050200@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345872992 13326 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2012 05:36:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 25 07:36:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T592u-0004At-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:36:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T592s-0004hC-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T592o-0004h7-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T592o-0007GV-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:48095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T592n-0007GR-PZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M9A00F00PIMYF00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:34:54 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M9A00FN3Q66PM90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:34:54 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <50383F42.1050200@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152826 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:58:10 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 08/24/2012 06:38 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > I wonder if there is a gdb deficiency we can easily address. > > I looked into this and it turns out that it can be addressed, > on the platforms that support "gcc -g3". -g3 is not the default, > which means random Emacs builds are unlikely to work with GDB and > macros. FWIW, I always wondered why we don't use "-ggdb -g3" by default, when GCC is the compiler.