From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay issue Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4dah7f8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4dhonng.fsf@gnu.org> <83two4olqj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9k3mphx.fsf@gnu.org> <834mg2kvj7.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1upj6ml.fsf@gnu.org> <83si3kht2b.fsf@gnu.org> <56608701.9050802@gmx.at> <566149F0.1090408@gmx.at> <56615343.2090901@gmx.at> <5661554A.9050209@gmx.at> <5661574A.60900@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449222487 20959 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2015 09:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yuan.mei.list@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 04 10:47:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4my6-0007G5-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:47:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4my5-0004Nb-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mxr-0004NJ-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mxm-0001xm-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:56335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mxl-0001xV-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:47:38 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYT00000UPIYX00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:42:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYT00O6UUZ6VV30@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:42:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5661574A.60900@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195868 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:05:14 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel > > > Without cairo: > > > > 17 (#o21, #x11, ?\C-q) > > > > With cairo: > > > > 16 (#o20, #x10, ?\C-p) > > So it's the Cairo font backend. 59 text lines plus one menu bar line > give the 60 pixels difference. I don't understand how can it do that with the same size of the same font. Some bug in ftcrfont.c, perhaps?