From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: How can I rethrow an error after recording a backtrace?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:03:23 +0300
Message-ID: <83y44ajjtg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <53ca9864-3a3b-8406-65c9-8458d0512299@gmail.com>
	<jwvmvksaraj.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
	<c17c72af-fc70-67fb-810b-cb31d633ade4@gmail.com>
	<jwvk2futzpe.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470477836 977 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2016 10:03:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 10:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: clement.pit@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 06 12:03:52 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1bVySG-0007AV-Qa
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:03:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48684 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1bVySD-0002Vz-68
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:03:41 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40835)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1bVyS4-0002Vf-CU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:03:35 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1bVyS2-0004Mi-Cv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:03:31 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32795)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1bVyS2-0004MV-9L; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:03:30 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1828
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1bVyS0-000640-CD; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:03:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvk2futzpe.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:11:55 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206438
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/206438>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:11:55 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> As I said elsewhere, I think this num-* side-condition can be dropped
> because the inhibit-debugger variable should catch the same problems
> but better.

So maybe we should avoid entering the debugger only if _both_
variables say we shouldn't.  That would be safer than just tossing
num-nonmacro-input-events.