From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding performance issues with the Emacs 25.1 Windows-build Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:12:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83y40mgccr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1478680445.2214391.782069929.51F43E52@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83shr0fwsu.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa1ofu6u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8d7f0uo.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83k2cae9gt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h97deo1h.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87vavqxdgh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831syehw56.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpg6vw5c.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479147224 27568 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2016 18:13:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jostein@kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 19:13:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Lkd-0002Bo-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:13:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Lkg-0000AU-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Ljr-00009U-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Ljq-0002Dv-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6LjW-000257-UX; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:11:54 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2040 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c6LjV-0005U4-Pa; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:11:54 -0500 In-reply-to: <87wpg6vw5c.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209389 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jostein@kjonigsen.net, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It's okay. In general, if you don't strip the binaries, it would be > > better to also include -g3 in CFLAGS (so that there's debug info > > there, and reports about crashes can be accompanied by meaningful > > information), but for a release it is less important than for a > > pretest, so I see no need for yet another build. > > Confused? You mean to have four builds in total? No, of course not. Just 2: one for x86, the other x86_64. > Or you want me to configure with: > > CFLAGS="-O2 -static -g3" That's the best if you don't strip the binaries, yes. Thanks, and sorry for the confusion I caused.