From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: i18n/l10n summary Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:45:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83y3t7aei1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3931675f-e26c-2f14-b229-61f518816fff@cs.ucla.edu> <0aec575b-6cbe-bc87-2d54-7de95be5c080@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496594737 24160 195.159.176.226 (4 Jun 2017 16:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, jean.christophe.helary@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 04 18:45:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYec-0005jP-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:45:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYei-0003SV-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYeb-0003SP-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:45:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYeY-0003Ga-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYeY-0003GS-Jj; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3680 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYeX-00046Z-M8; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:45:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <0aec575b-6cbe-bc87-2d54-7de95be5c080@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:54:31 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215443 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:54:31 -0700 > > However, on my platform those fixes slowed down a microbenchmark (format > "%d %s %c" 3 "def" ?‘) by 7%, so I installed the attached further patch, which > recovered the performance loss for me. Would it make sense to start collecting all those benchmarks, e.g. somewhere under test/, so that in due time we will have a sound body of code to make sure we don't lose performance during development? TIA