From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Identifying the face between STRETCH and right fringe. Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83y39ddvi1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zhu0f6tt.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgzrgb1f.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2fbg5bq.fsf@gnu.org> <83lg5jfs9o.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7luhnid.fsf@gnu.org> <838t1ehi6v.fsf@gnu.org> <831s76gxkq.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8g1fzdr.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7ltfsda.fsf@gnu.org> <835zwhfr56.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543421946 3745 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2018 16:19:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 28 17:19:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2YI-0000rW-Ap for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:19:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48577 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2aO-0005nu-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:21:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2ZS-0005kg-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2ZQ-0002RJ-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2ZP-0002Qa-QW; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1794 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2ZP-0003Fc-BT; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:20:11 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:21:38 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231490 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:21:38 +0100 > > > Why they don't do the same with face colors as they do with > > FRAME_BACKGROUND_PIXEL, i.e. convert to RGBA and store the RGBA in the > > face colors, instead of the indices. > > Because then every time they want to do something with a face colour, > they'd have to convert it from RGBA, allocate the corresponding > NSColor, use it, destroy it etc. But that's how every other platform does that, AFAIU...