From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore pending_signals when checking for quits. Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 22:15:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83y36nl7rl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190102212218.74902-1-phst@google.com> <83sgy93kkd.fsf@gnu.org> <834l9bmnyc.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="162291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: phst@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 21:21:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsvbf-000g3y-63 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 21:21:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsvbe-0004hj-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsvbG-0004TW-Oh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsvWG-0005z1-C1; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2774 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gsvWE-0006Gq-Kf; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:16:04 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:46:22 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233204 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:46:22 +0100 > Cc: Emacs developers , Philipp Stephani > > > If the only problem is the name, we could change the name. Or we > > could introduce a new function. But let's first agree about the > > substance: a well-behaving module should from time to time call > > process_pending_signals. Agreed? > > Yes, absolutely. We can't change the name (this would break backwards > compatibility), but introducing a new function would be fine. > For should_quit itself, I still think we should make the change in > this patch. The current code is clearly buggy: it promises to quit but > doesn't in most cases. I'm okay with such a change if it will be accompanied by introduction of that new function and suitable changes to the manual which explains why they are needed.