From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs i18n Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83y35rbvp4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o97aq6gz.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tvgoud56.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o96wk2mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1hjfvjd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871s3p0zdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8ckezyt.fsf@gnu.org> <83o96qegv1.fsf@gnu.org> <32b1ab1b-bef4-629a-8830-b1dcc6915087@cs.ucla.edu> <83a7iae9va.fsf@gnu.org> <05ed2dec-2a84-f7dc-1af5-c9d923992785@cs.ucla.edu> <87bm2p56gu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838sxrdgco.fsf@gnu.org> <862b9eb2-0662-41c5-fd17-3fa09fe2c1fe@cs.ucla.edu> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="607"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 06 21:22:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1d3T-0018G4-50 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:22:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1d3S-00039c-3P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:22:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1d2p-00039Q-H7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:21:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1d2p-0003Wz-9W; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:21:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3882 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h1d2j-0006TJ-4F; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:21:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <862b9eb2-0662-41c5-fd17-3fa09fe2c1fe@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:47:18 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233872 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:47:18 -0800 > > > . Do we use a separate message catalog for each Lisp package, or a > > single catalog for all of Emacs? > > We can start with a single catalog that handles core Emacs; we'll need > to do that anyway. We can deal with packages later. "Core" here being the C sources? That's about 4% of the doc strings, a drop in the sea.