From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start. Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:36:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2r8r2pj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200405134735.GD5049@ACM> <831rp0siqn.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="77888"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 06 18:37:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLUkE-000KAV-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 18:37:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLUkE-0003Ob-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLUjm-0002oh-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLUjl-0003rc-EZ; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3554 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jLUje-0002mP-1t; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:36:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:25:51 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246541 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:25:51 -0400 > > > Actually, we had a few detailed profiles posted which show many levels > > below "somewhere in jit-lock", at least for CC Mode. > > Hmm... I must have missed them. Sorry 'bout that. > Do we then know where the time is really spent? I think the profiles do show that, at least for CC Mode when fontifying a C buffer (xdisp.c). I do agree, of course, that we should profile and measure more before making any firm conclusions. But let's not dismiss what we already have.