From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: transient Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 19:13:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2q6l5q9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87368npxw4.fsf@bernoul.li> <87v9ljo5d0.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ftcnxu5m.fsf@bernoul.li> <83y2qezlpd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv12zjx1.fsf@gnu.org> <20200429101755.GF24737@tuxteam.de> <838sicw4do.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhaqu89z.fsf@gnu.org> <83sggiu2p9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1w2s9wi.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9leqmss.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhapoz63.fsf@gnu.org> <0a13f7e1-61c7-1e78-22bc-a27c15c269e7@yandex.ru> <83h7wxotix.fsf@gnu.org> <18096f9a-c617-f37b-cdaa-1a6198db2e1c@yandex.ru> <83a72porka.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu6nok4v.fsf@gnu.org> <83a72mmo8y.fsf@gnu.org> <0178C7DC-3565-49C5-BC0A-4105D9BF5B5F@traduction-libre.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="63693"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 18:14:44 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jW0DU-000GSY-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 18:14:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW0DT-0002Io-6z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:14:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW0Cx-0001s4-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW0Cw-000053-7U; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3469 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jW0Cv-0005nk-Jc; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:14:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0178C7DC-3565-49C5-BC0A-4105D9BF5B5F@traduction-libre.org> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Wed, 6 May 2020 00:39:41 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249005 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 00:39:41 +0900 > > > Thanks, but in long lists of loosely-related items, it is usually > > better to arrange them in alphabetical order, since it makes it easier > > to find what you need. > > The items are not loosely related once grouped and the list is not long. The list is almost 30 items long. > Putting the list arbitrarily in alphabetical order adds to its complexity. Sorry, I disagree. And we had in the past bug reports that requested alphabetical order in similar list (I don't remember if this one was one of them), so I think people generally like this better.