From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaning out old X11 toolkits? Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83y2ftdtkr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87czx7ycva.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eehmyalr.fsf@gmail.com> <877dneoewi.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z2yy6z7.fsf@gmail.com> <1c0598ce-c364-1711-8280-18e4ae091fb6@yandex.ru> <2fd8df6a-1993-fc1e-6e65-12938b0f57b3@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, contovob@tcd.ie, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru, yandros@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 19:36:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdJ5-0003AD-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:36:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdJ3-0005i0-F0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdG8-0003tC-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:33:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdG7-0001CK-OV; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:33:39 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4163 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdG2-0001vj-RD; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:33:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2fd8df6a-1993-fc1e-6e65-12938b0f57b3@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:56:20 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264548 Archived-At: > Cc: Yuan Fu , Alan Third , > emacs-devel , "Basil L. Contovounesios" > , Stefan Monnier , > Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii > From: martin rudalics > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:56:20 +0100 > > > Is there are reason to keep Motif, if Lucid is available? > > > > Any particular advantages to it? > > On GNU/Linux it's the only build with a wrapping menu bar (like that of > Windows). Why is that important? Wrapping menu bar is generally a sign of a misconfigured frame.