From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:26:49 +0200
Message-ID: <83y2ef7zwm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org>
 <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org>
 <MW2PR2101MB11006FF55FF141A5682FEE83F0659@MW2PR2101MB1100.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
 <87tup3hwat.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <834kh39fvj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tup3gfwy.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAO2hHWaU98Hkmkh2E0QMjSJ2wefJCFC_Gqai_yv8NVLdFvaeyA@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="6070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org,
 Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com
To: chad <yandros@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 20:30:41 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lOQG8-0001Si-SE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:30:40 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42286 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lOQG7-00029z-OA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:30:39 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47146)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lOQCb-0006Ih-NA
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:27:02 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37540)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lOQCZ-0007oN-DW; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:27:00 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2562
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lOQCM-0001LL-AZ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:26:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAO2hHWaU98Hkmkh2E0QMjSJ2wefJCFC_Gqai_yv8NVLdFvaeyA@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from chad on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:21:23 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266800
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/266800>

> From: chad <yandros@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:21:23 -0700
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>, Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com, 
> 	EMACS development team <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> I'm having a hard time finding a behavior difference between `C-o C-n' and `C-j' in these contexts. Can
> someone help me understand the difference?

C-j doesn't only insert a newline.  In fact, in some modes it does
something utterly different.  That's a stark contrast to what C-o with
or without C-n does.