From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 29.0.60; keymap-local-set and keymap-global-set became less strict Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:37:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83y1pi1wz4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5876987d-2479-f512-5767-218c8c16a909@daniel-mendler.de> <875ycngyji.fsf@gnus.org> <87zg9zvzuc.fsf@gmail.com> <831qna3frm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt5yogct.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33662"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, mail@daniel-mendler.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 17:38:36 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMteV-0008Wo-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:38:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMtdi-0004Np-Lz; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMtdf-0004Nf-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMtde-0007ig-52; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=SlOgpBCtQUI3UbkxSKgi2jT5MXjCHLRekok7KbS48sI=; b=Q+x+SNzJgvOfWcaBbnF5 yGBMlc68+smQMH6prrTZ3GcWGMJIWHIbGzYjeln6+9TO0FC++SG2Ue4YMcyDYzgTGkPR1zUlTrhxL lImC2VND4lV1c9t/pDCAGqFrlXVSGv8y3vH5f9Pnzk7dvvqD22qvrutxlX60x+lIgEC35nlHyKsKh Ot5kzOCge/6twWqzb9vmdKMMn7VT71YwynmB87zCm/yxBiE5uWllH2qGqyZAbMv00Z7I3bUy4fm5O XOatOGyW/avDRHylfLmK5Mada4SPyP6TjE+eetLZ0o6U2esKxY/LvDTR/pPqVW3/ivzSYfL1Lw9cv /Ng3Ce6WF/pmfQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMtdc-0007N4-4T; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mt5yogct.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:48:02 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302839 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, mail@daniel-mendler.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:48:02 +0100 > > >>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:06:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: > > Eli> Why does it have to be so complicated, though? If the problem is not > Eli> to call key-description in non-interactive invocations, can't we call > Eli> key-description inside the interactive form? Or use some other trick > Eli> to invoke key-description only in interactive calls? > > ? Weʼre only calling key-description inside `interactive' in the > patch. I meant _before_ the patch. The only problem with that code was that it called key-description fro non-interactive invocations. Can't we handle just that minor issue, and leave the rest intact? If not, why not?