From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging feature/android Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:35:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83y1odc37g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87edq7ztks.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87edq7ztks.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pm9reccn.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8jjxxo9.fsf@yahoo.com> <835ybje2u5.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsanxoah.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zg8vckx5.fsf@gnu.org> <87bklay7wg.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ilficn4k.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg8uw9b9.fsf@yahoo.com> <837cvycjse.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttz2w4c3.fsf@yahoo.com> <83356mcbxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm9qvu9w.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 03 15:37:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY6Wt-0005Z1-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:37:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY6W0-0000yE-Sj; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY6Vy-0000xg-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY6Vx-0000vn-3Y; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:36:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=v7K9nR5zRzZMKWhs7/7NvxglQrL7jxigq896QTgH9wc=; b=i4wtkBY2h2rw oiacptu/7LywDpm1ReZkdBQ8dXYeSVXeORNhS26pbpBFNwRWhuYUVJpw3PamADOhm6C8tcyMNHzj/ svnArVhNMtW31DA1aOQ9ng9YWPOMLWQrd9PaC9Jofq0vu/+evC6BpffcMwlDoRBgJ9OxlFnWYfokz 6N+Xxt0ESWnhC0iwdRdyv0Hgry9tx3WPFzijpGfFhPiRmP7jxG4ROs694zznta7OYhGMTYMPAj8yB /p6yIdEeCzjMWcvEAwNr39SBzjvhnjzWKQBKWGlg2bY3hAJvZYI8r6BVMzAEsm/vR5TxksW6p03XT zC/bFXffespzNhc4T+70ng==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY6Vv-0004e1-E6; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:36:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pm9qvu9w.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 03 Mar 2023 21:28:27 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303923 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu > Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 21:28:27 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So why shouldn't it be the same with modules? Don't we want the user > > to be aware that modules support will be absent? > > No, I don't think so: that would amount to making Emacs not build > by default without a recent GCC. We had this in emacs-module.c for a long time, including two major releases. How come it was never a problem until now?