From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Minibuffer keymaps
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 17:44:17 +0300
Message-ID: <83y1h6gou6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <p918r96x0er.fsf@google.com> <837coqk6rr.fsf@gnu.org>
 <p91led62n9o.fsf@google.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="8231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 16 16:44:44 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1qhWXM-0001xp-Jh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 16:44:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1qhWX2-0003hq-23; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:44:24 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qhWX0-0003hS-3v
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:44:22 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1qhWWz-0005fC-S2; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:44:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=ZtJfV3piZTLPSd1M+Pi9E+OsJ8gmfuDkuclXxYkYji4=; b=rCO+bWhicPft
 Pi0KbnmRce+EAd2l7Qt1WYq+F3d7TTSJyKOPC4P0Fqh5COBHm23712LCtCxnitGUlazMQ1m2jjWrB
 gWsgb3DzY15MkSzOGjpq7LBgysgBqXzyAx3e6tRS+HJh3Yi8f05z789U5Wa4Wpy6+X54WICBGNXxh
 +9FP2W8aG92SuEQGm0/7Gm0XMSVpg9XtSJ7eOoiUrtkpooF3gVC6XO1L93P0ikdwYfAfTbZiYmEU9
 sBu+lmx/FLAJACM6/QnnDLQJMML5T7632rV/vAIAJmLgdHLK71aByuEVZfamawIaPibOeJytHaIXT
 ySAOjRlnkiTFczyF2Px7PQ==;
In-Reply-To: <p91led62n9o.fsf@google.com> (raman@google.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:310630
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/310630>

> From: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 07:41:55 -0700
> 
> Thanks! That said, are there cases today where minibuffer doesn't offer
> completion? -- Perhaps read-string  and some others, but we could
> simplify things if it's worth it by just having completion available in
> all minibuffers.

I don't think we want to force all minibuffer-reading programs to use
completion.  There's no reason for that, and having two maps doesn't
make Emacs much more complex than if we had just one.  The flexibility
of being able to use the minibuffer without completion is more
important.