From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:37:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83wrddwtkk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> <87mxeaar26.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6DFF55.3000708@gmx.at> <87ehzlnaxj.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6E1D4C.7030601@gmx.at> <87littrcyy.fsf@wanadoo.es> <831uvlyckf.fsf@gnu.org> <83zki9wx4u.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3f5r89e.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315849047 27325 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 17:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 19:37:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ARc-0003H1-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:37:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40524 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ARc-0003eX-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ARZ-0003eH-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ARY-0007pt-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:50996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ARY-0007po-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LRF00M007JH4T00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:37:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.9.62]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LRF00LO67M2ZX90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:37:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87d3f5r89e.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143944 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:16:29 +0200 >=20 > emacs -Q >=20 > M-x server-start >=20 > (from a terminal): emacsclient -c -nw >=20 > (on the emacs' X frame): M-x delete-windows-on (select the currentl= y > displayed buffer) >=20 > The graphical frame goes away. I guess other_visible_frames should also consider which terminal thos= e other frames are visible on. If the frame under consideration is the only one on its terminal, then it should not be deleted.