From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnutls for win32 Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:40:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83wr9bqez3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa68dfao.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty4fbje8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83ehvjs8t5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqf3bcom.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83boqns68o.fsf@gnu.org> <87liprazr1.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325454042 5092 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2012 21:40:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 21:40:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 01 22:40:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhT8w-0004UH-BB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:40:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhT8v-0004q6-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:40:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhT8s-0004pq-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:40:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhT8r-0005XK-Ab for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:40:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:64310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhT8r-0005XE-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:40:33 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LX500G002PO0200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:40:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.18.76]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LX500ECP2UK6RO0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:39:57 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87liprazr1.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147139 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:17:54 -0500 > > EZ> I think downloading a single zip archive and unzipping it is much > EZ> easier than adding GnuTLS to Emacs. > > For every Emacs user? Only those who need it. I'm not sure what fraction would that be, but if it's not very large, including GnuTLS in the binary package would unnecessarily punish too many people, by letting them download a significantly larger file. > Can we include it in the binaries Christoph is putting out, even if > it's not built with Emacs itself? We could, but see above. We currently don't even include libxpm, although it's much, much smaller.