From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:30:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpp6e153.fsf@gnu.org> References: <64a52598-ad53-498c-993c-67d7827dbdfc@default> <838u1uuuau.fsf@gnu.org> <878u1um2xl.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87fuw090k7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y49spuxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4achc.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <83r3fkpb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5rps0t.fsf@gnu.org> <56E066BD.5050403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wpp9jt82.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov1dje9.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <83pouyfk6k.fsf@gnu.org> <9174d641-9f3f-6c03-2383-a4d5b7ac4f10@yandex.ru> <834mcafgco.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457890286 18643 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 17:31:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 18:31:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1af9rL-0004WG-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:31:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9rK-0006L1-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9rH-0006Jj-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9rH-00078I-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9rC-00077H-G1; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4583 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1af9r4-000828-14; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:02 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Yuri Khan on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:22:40 +0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201617 Archived-At: > From: Yuri Khan > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:22:40 +0600 > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Emacs developers , > Stefan Monnier , "rms@gnu.org" > > > No, I mean the messages corrected in commits by others. > > Commits by others do not typically occur on branches which are > socially accepted as rebasable. The only case I can think of is when > you cherry-pick someone’s commit into your feature branch while that > commit had been corrected. Is that the case you have in mind? No, I mean "git pull --rebase" and its variants. AFAIK, there's nothing anti-social in such a workflow, when you have local unpushed commits that you intend to push later.