From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:58:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpgzo30m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twe6sx2g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477213135 28249 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 08:58:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 10:58:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byEc9-0006Bx-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:58:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byEcC-0005bz-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byEc5-0005bj-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byEc2-0004ST-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byEc2-0004SP-Dn; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2540 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byEc1-0002Cp-Kr; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:58:38 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:57:21 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208611 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:57:21 -0700 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I thought we agreed to get rid of unexec by loading a single .elc file > > at startup of Emacs > > Yes, if that performs well enough. We don't know yet whether it will. It's on my > list of things to look into, but it's not trivial. Can you share the concerns and the tests you'd like to be performed? Perhaps others (myself included) could help with such testing. Thanks.