From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:23:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532960619 22548 195.159.176.226 (30 Jul 2018 14:23:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fgunbin@fastmail.fm, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 30 16:23:34 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fk95C-0005m7-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:23:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52911 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fk97J-0006Qn-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fk94g-0005I6-Ps for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fk94f-0005cU-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fk94f-0005cO-P7; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1595 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fk94f-0000Ih-6b; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:23:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:44:07 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227991 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:44:07 +0200 > Cc: Filipp Gunbin , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > If nobody objects, I could do this. However, during the discussion it > was proposed to find a common indication for asynchronous file > operations. > > `C-u C-u' will work for the `find-file' family of commands, but it > doesn't work for `save-buffer', which uses already `C-u', `C-u C-u', > `C-u C-u C-u' and `C-u 0'. Indeed. So I think the case for having a new prefix command akin to "C-x RET c" becomes stronger and stronger.