From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell* Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:00:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83woraal0c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sh1y535s.fsf@web.de> <8336tyc1ou.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537808323 2683 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2018 16:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 18:58:39 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UBy-0000Yv-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:58:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46169 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UE5-00078D-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UDm-0006zG-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UDi-0002z9-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UDi-0002yv-FR; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1076 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g4UDh-00010a-F5; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:26 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:40:39 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230027 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:40:39 -0400 > > This said, the bulk of my answer isn't affected: sit-for shouldn't be > interrupted by subprocess output either, I think. Really? I think sit-for is expected to stop waiting when we read something from a subprocess; sleep-for makes a point of restarting the wait when that happens.