From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 13:39:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83wodoagwg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmolqryw.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83blz5bh2m.fsf@gnu.org> <87h88x4fqw.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <834l4xbfmp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef414dfn.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83o9359w3l.fsf@gnu.org> <83eezycce5.fsf@gnu.org> <87muekj0i9.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <87lfu4iyjj.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="110524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri D'Elia Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 01 12:40:38 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFFa9-000SeY-K6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:40:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40212 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFFa7-00068y-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFFZK-00068r-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFFZJ-0000q8-Io; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1142 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iFFZI-0003Gv-51; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 06:39:44 -0400 In-reply-to: <87lfu4iyjj.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> (message from Yuri D'Elia on Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:51:28 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240430 Archived-At: > From: Yuri D'Elia > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers > Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:51:28 +0200 > > But if I'd take two integers, I would put 10,100 or even 10,1000 instead. > When scanning through large files I'd rather think in bigger numbers. Can you tell why? 100 lines might fit in a single windowful, but 1000 most probably won't. So what is the purpose of having such far-away milestones? Are you using line numbers for something other than navigation through the buffer?