From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:40:38 +0200
Message-ID: <83wocbelu1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <jwv8soub2u5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83h83ignrz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CALDnm50SjOOKOiZVmdNJc8zVsfZXbPQcBOYoeJe9MbO62Lartw@mail.gmail.com>
 <83ftj2gma8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CALDnm50YW0cjdN1Z7eJs6K-dXpfwp1VOe3NPi6WH+iF1oU1HmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CALDnm52T_RpJ43geQ07czZfGKbXEK_Oqa0pT2F8SKEvvoEtV0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus>
 <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CALDnm505nHxgGHzkOq4KeobFJAz1HDvT8wZxP1-OETfyy+bqmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CALDnm531Q7kQbf+iPJf_LeHumDE7A9BbM6kX8fadzB1oRj2YsA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="25746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: spacibba@aol.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= <joaotavora@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 07 16:41:08 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1iSjuE-0006W4-KD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:41:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1iSjuD-0006Ga-BL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:41:05 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33011)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1iSju1-0006GQ-60
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:40:54 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44771)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1iSjtz-00083L-PE; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:40:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2253 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1iSjty-0001Xu-IU; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:40:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <CALDnm531Q7kQbf+iPJf_LeHumDE7A9BbM6kX8fadzB1oRj2YsA@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:00:41
 +0000)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241936
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/241936>

> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:00:41 +0000
> Cc: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, 
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> 
> OK! So will you accept a version of my "renames" patch that affects
> just the `flex` completion style? (or maybe the flex and the other
> esoteric completion styles (pcm, substring)?

I admit that I don't understand the purpose of that renaming.  I
thought we were discussing how to highlight parts of completion
candidates differently from what we do now, not about renaming the
related faces.  Why are face names important enough to justify their
renaming?