From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about ibuffer Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:37:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83woc27q93.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> <20191110031743.uy653armkqcawkkg@Ergus> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="40874"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 10:38:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVBZz-000ATh-A7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:38:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVBZx-0004vS-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:38:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVBZS-0004vG-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVBZR-0000Hb-Bm; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3842 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVBZQ-0000Wm-Do; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:37:45 -0500 In-reply-to: <20191110031743.uy653armkqcawkkg@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:17:43 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242137 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:17:43 +0100 > From: Ergus > > >Why, if we have imenu (which looks better than the list-buffers), it is > >not the default for C-x C-b? > > > >I know it is just a line in the config, but for example when loading > >with emacs -Q will be available by default and have a most modern view. > > > >Is it a reason for that or just the typical disagree about defaults? > > Sorry I mean ibuffer my bad. I have C-x C-b rebound to a different command long ago (not to ibuffer), and I don't really understand why we need to talk about defaults that are so easy to change as the user sees fit. If we do change the default in this case, we will need to adapt the related documentation, including the tutorial and the user manual.